This image expresses spatial hierarchy by attracting the viewers eye to one location. The viewer's eye is immediately drawn down the lines of the railroad track. You can't actually see what the track ends at, which is one of the interesting aspects of this picture. At the begining of the track you can see clear detail of the railroad track (the individual boards inbetween the rails), and as your eyes move down the picture the amount of detail that is able to be seen decreases.
Tuesday, October 26, 2010
Spatial Hierarchy
This image expresses spatial hierarchy by attracting the viewers eye to one location. The viewer's eye is immediately drawn down the lines of the railroad track. You can't actually see what the track ends at, which is one of the interesting aspects of this picture. At the begining of the track you can see clear detail of the railroad track (the individual boards inbetween the rails), and as your eyes move down the picture the amount of detail that is able to be seen decreases.
Vantage Point: Flatness
In this picture it appears that the beach actually rests on top of the boat. From this actual vantage point in 3D, you would be able to tell that the beach is in the distance. However in this photograph, the 3D image is turned into a 2D image which changes the meaning of the picture. The flatness of this photograph creates the image that the beach is actually resting on the boat.
Monday, October 25, 2010
Flatness
Wednesday, October 20, 2010
flatness
spatial heirarchy and flatness shown through photography
Tuesday, October 19, 2010
Flatness and Spatial Hierarchy
At first, this image seems to be a mess of lines and tone. The vines hanging from the tops of the trees drag the eyes down while, at the same time, the vantage point of the image directs the eyes up, following the trunks of the tree. The image was taken looking up, which is why our eyes follow the trunks; however, once they reach the top, the thin vines (without any markers of depth) drag them back down. The flatness of this picture allows for this contradiction, for the up and down movement our eyes make. Because the image is flat rather than three dimensional, the illusion of depth (or lack of depth as portrayed by the vines) can exist. In this way, the image is "solved" rather than composed. From another vantage point, the images would just be flat trees without any kind of interesting directional movement of the eyes (such as the up and down contradiction created here).

At first the eye is drawn to the people in the image. They're the main focus of the image, and they're dressed funny. In the foreground of the image is a camera, framing the people. While the camera is not quite in focus and the function is more of a framing nature, the camera is important. We see that the man is positioning the people and that (because the camera is there) he is a photographer. This makes the image he is about to take much more deliberate than perhaps the subject (what seems to be members of some kind of native tribe) should be. The size of the camera suggests it's importance and perhaps what the meaning the photographer is trying to get across.
Spatial hierarchy and flatness


Monday, October 18, 2010
Spatial Hierarchy and Flatness


Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)